|
1. WISC VIQ >
PIQ by at least 10 points.
|
Yes/No
|
|
2. Highest of
verbal scaled scores from WISC or WISC-R include
Two of the
following:
Vocabulary
Similarities
Information
|
Yes/No
Score
Score
Score
|
|
3. Lowest of the
Performance scaled scores WISC or WISC-R
include two of
the following:
Block Design
Object Assembly
Coding
|
Yes/No
Score
Score
Score
|
|
4. Target Test
is at least 1 SD below the mean
|
Yes/No
|
|
5. WRAT Standard
Score for Reading is at least 8 points greater than
Arithmetic.
|
Yes/No
|
|
6. TPT Right,
Left, and Both hand scores become progressively worse vis-à-vis norms
|
Yes/No
|
|
7. No or very
minimal simple tactile imperception and suppression
|
Yes/No
|
|
8. Very poor
finger agnosia
|
Yes/No
|
|
9. Very poor
stereognosis
.
|
Yes/No
|
|
10. Normal to
superior grip strength
Scores:
|
Yes/No
|
|
11. Mild to
moderate impairment on Grooved Pegboard
Score:
|
Yes/No
|
|
12. Evidence of
a preponderance of somatosensory or psychomotor errors
on the left
side.
|
Yes/No
|
|
Normal to
superior Speech-Sounds Perception and Auditory Closure
versus somewhat
poorer Sentence Memory and Very poor Phonemically Cued Verbal Fluency.
|
Yes/No
|
|
Description of
information
|
Where to gather
information
|
|
1. WISC VIQ >
PIQ by at least 10 points.
Weschler’s Intelligence Test
|
Review testing,
usually done by psychologist
|
|
2. Highest of
verbal scaled scores from WISC or WISC-R include
Two of the
following:
Vocabulary
Similarities
Information
|
Review testing,
usually done by psychologist
|
|
3. Lowest of the
Performance scaled scores WISC or WISC-R
include two of
the following:
Block Design
Object Assembly
Coding
|
Review testing,
usually done by psychologist
|
|
4. Target Test
is at least 1 SD below the mean-
Hitting
suspended ball with finger as in the Peabody Assessment. Tests timing, eye/hand, motor planning and
anticipation
|
Occupational
Therapist
|
|
5. WRAT Standard
Score for Reading is at least 8 points greater than
Arithmetic.
|
Psychologist or
Resource Teacher
|
|
6. TPT Right,
Left, and Both hand scores become progressively worse vis-à-vis norms –
mimicking of hand patterns such as rapidly reversing repetitive hand
movements – and performance worsens with repeated trials rather than
improving. Use Quick Neurological
Screening Test, Sensory Integration and Praxis test
|
Occupational
Therapist
|
|
7. No or very
minimal simple tactile imperception and suppression – no evidence of tactile
desensitization per Sims Weinstein Filament Test
|
Occupational
Therapist
|
|
8. Very poor
finger agnosia – unable to identify letters drawn onto fingers
|
Occupational
Therapist
|
|
9. Very poor
stereognosis – unable to identify objects placed in hand with vision
occluded.
.
|
Occupational
Therapist
|
|
10. Normal to superior
grip strength- As measured by clinical observation or the Dynamometer
|
Occupational
Therapist
|
|
11. Mild to
moderate impairment on Grooved Pegboard-
Measured with Standardized
Groove Peg Board.
|
Occupational
Therapist
|
|
12. Evidence of
a preponderance of somatosensory or psychomotor errors
on the left
side. – child had significant praxis deficits (motor planning, ideation and
execution), pronounced on left side.
|
Occupational
Therapist
|
|
Normal to
superior Speech-Sounds Perception and Auditory Closure
versus somewhat
poorer Sentence Memory and Very poor Phonemically Cued Verbal Fluency. –
Articulation and enunciation is good, poor content of speech, poor use of
pragmatics
|
Speech and
Language Therapist
|